Clinical Education & Medical Simulation.

Clin Edu Med Sim.
Periodicity – biannual.

Download PDF

Clinical Education & Medical Simulation

2019, vol. 2, nr 1, January-June, p. 5–9

doi: 10.17219/cems/109323

Publication type: review article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Preparing the ground: Inducting and sustaining instructors for the European Trauma Course

Mike Davis1,A,B,C,D,F

1 Freelance consultant in continuing medical education, Blackpool, The United Kingdom

Abstract

This paper describes the origins, structure and purposes for the instructor development programme (ID) initiated in support of the European Trauma Course (ETC) now taught throughout Europe, North Africa and recently, Brazil. The paper addresses the threefold focus for the programme: providing appropriate preparation and planning time with attendance to equipment and other logistical issues; revisiting relevant education theory to explore the why and how of ETC presentation; and the opportunity to develop a coherent sense of team membership arising from the diverse community of practice manifested among ETC instructors across Europe. The paper focuses on some of the challenges associated with group to team development and outlines some developmental strategies that emerge from a shared analysis of problematic issues in course presentation resulting from the complexity of trauma management in the clinical setting and how a course can adequately address those. The need for a systematic evaluation of instructor training is identified and possible strategies are briefly explored.

Key words

groups and teams, ETC Instructor training, programme evaluation, instructor faculty identity and performance

References (14)

  1. Thies K, Gwinnutt C, Driscoll P, et al. The European Trauma Course – from concept to course. Resuscitation. 2007;74(1):135–141.
  2. Lott C, Araujo R, Cassar MR, et al. The European Trauma Course (ETC) and the team approach: Past, present and future. Resuscitation. 2009;84(10):1192–1196.
  3. Davis M. Should there be a UK based advanced trauma course? Emerg Med J. 2005;22(1):5–6.
  4. McKeown D. Should the UK develop and run its own advanced trauma course? Emerg Med J. 2005;22(1):6–7.
  5. Brand JW. Generic Instructor Course. BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39617.852095.7D
  6. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press;1991.
  7. Davis M. ETC Instructor Course: Pre-course reading for instructor candidates. 2nd ed. 2018. CMC. https://www.dropbox.com/s/dksvp828bi7367o/ETC%20Instructor%20Course_Pre-course%20reading%20for%20Instructor%20Candidates%20%282nd%20edition%29.docx?dl=0. Accessed October 17, 2018.
  8. ETC CMC. European Trauma Course: The Team Approach. 4th ed. Antwerp, Belgium: ETCO; 2018.
  9. Lewin K. Force field analysis. In: Pfeiffer JW, Jones JE. The 1973 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators. Highland, CA: University Associates;1973:111–113.
  10. Madsen DØ. SWOT analysis: A management fashion perspective. International Journal of Business Research. 2016;16(1):39–56.
  11. Bion W. Experiences in Groups. London, UK: Tavistock Publications; 1961.
  12. Kirkpatrick Partners. The leading model from training results. https://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com. Accessed April 10, 2019.
  13. ETC. The team approach to trauma. ETC http://europeantraumacourse.com/candidate-feedback/ [accessed 6th April 2019]
  14. Yardley S & Dornan T. Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’. Med Educ. 2011;46(1):97–106.